tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6984855242087800141.comments2023-10-24T08:37:43.553-07:00Let's Talk CoverageGordon and Silber, P.C.http://www.blogger.com/profile/02590247412054250416noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6984855242087800141.post-78205770972857805952015-02-03T12:08:17.269-08:002015-02-03T12:08:17.269-08:00Very nice post.
Excess Liability InsuranceVery nice post.<br /><a href="http://associationcontractorstradesmen.com/" rel="nofollow">Excess Liability Insurance</a><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04665136968124725322noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6984855242087800141.post-88283049544555764232009-08-27T13:05:02.013-07:002009-08-27T13:05:02.013-07:00Roy; appreciate your comment. Have to agree with ...Roy; appreciate your comment. Have to agree with you regarding the natural tendency of the courts to bend over backwards to find coverage. Its up to us to keep them honest. Returned the favor by linking to your blog. Look out for my my NYLJ article in early October (3?)regarding P.J.P. Mechanical Corp. v. Commerce and Industry Ins. Co.<br />--- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2009 WL 1687773.Gordon and Silber, P.C.https://www.blogger.com/profile/02590247412054250416noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6984855242087800141.post-74471016403250295212009-08-24T09:42:01.682-07:002009-08-24T09:42:01.682-07:00Welcome to the blogosphere, Jon. Spotted your blo...Welcome to the blogosphere, Jon. Spotted your blog this morning. I've added a link for yours to <a href="http://nycoveragecounsel.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">my blawgroll</a>. <br /><br />I agree that Neymoyer's decision on St. Paul's no-claim-within-policy-period defense is problematic. Perhaps he went the preclusion route because he knew the January 3, 2007 letter probably isn't enough to qualify as a "claim", especially under decisions such as <a href="http://nycoveragecounsel.blogspot.com/2008/09/lawyers-please-be-advised-letter-found.html" rel="nofollow"><i>Yale Club of New York City, Inc. v. Reliance Ins. Co. in Liquidation</i></a>. Still, as you must know, in an effort to find coverage for people who have been injured or harmed, courts often do what this court arguably did -- stretch the established rules of waiver, estoppel and statutory preclusion to provide a source of insurance dollars and indemnification.Roy A. Murahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06367888044845855898noreply@blogger.com